This is not a human. It is stone. It is also not George Washington. George Washington was a living person and this is not. This is a sculpture representing George Washington.

The image below is also meant to represent George Washington by way of a costume. In addition, it is a (photo of) a living, breathing human being — not a sculpture. (As an added bonus to the topic at hand, this particular example is smaller than the original man.)

Quick question… is the boy in the George Washington costume meant to represent the man, or represent the sculpture of the man?
If the designer who created the costume took inspiration from the Houdon or some other sculpture, would you then think the boy is meant to represent a sculpture? Or to represent the man — the first president? I would say the man.
Now let’s talk about this.

Now to my point…
THIS IS NOT A BONSAI!
THIS IS ALSO NOT A SCULPTURE OF A BONSAI.
This is a sculpture of a tree. In my humble opinion, neither this nor any other wire sculpture of a tree should ever be referred to as bonsai, wire bonsai, bonsai sculpture or any variation thereof, and this is for the same reasons, described above, that the boy is not wearing a sculpture costume, but rather a George Washington costume.
A bonsai is a living plant in a pot that is a miniature representation of a full size tree. Bonsai is an art form. It is living sculpture.
A wire sculpture is not living plant so it does not meet the definition of bonsai. I think we can all agree on that point, but even if the wire artist was inspired by bonsai, he is using that inspiration to represent the same subject as bonsai — a tree.
I hope I have sufficiently explained my logic in this conclusion. Now, kindly refrain from referring to wire tree sculptures as bonsai. And could one of you please correct all the places it is wrong on the internet?
Thank you!









